<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Security isn&#039;t convinient..</title>
	<link>http://gsandahl.net/2006/03/26/security-isnt-convinient/</link>
	<description>Random rants on Defensive Security</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Home of Göran Sandahl &#187; SANS recommends BETA-patches</title>
		<link>http://gsandahl.net/2006/03/26/security-isnt-convinient/#comment-44</link>
		<author>Home of Göran Sandahl &#187; SANS recommends BETA-patches</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 08:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gsandahl.net/2006/03/26/security-isnt-convinient/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] SANS seems to be taking the same route as I am on the Microsoft zero day issues by recommending Microsoft to release BETA-versions of their patches, so that customers can them selves decide to use them or not. Their argument is that the (very much necessary) testing phases is done at two times, and at separate moments, when customers could in fact aid Microsoft in testing the patches. I like what I hear.. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] SANS seems to be taking the same route as I am on the Microsoft zero day issues by recommending Microsoft to release BETA-versions of their patches, so that customers can them selves decide to use them or not. Their argument is that the (very much necessary) testing phases is done at two times, and at separate moments, when customers could in fact aid Microsoft in testing the patches. I like what I hear.. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
